How ShieldBot compares

An honest look versus Lakera (Check Point), Protect AI (Palo Alto Prisma AIRS), and HiddenLayer. ● strong · ◐ partial · ○ none.

CapabilityLakeraProtect AIHiddenLayerShieldBot
Prompt injection / jailbreak●◐◐●
Indirect injection (RAG / tool results)◐◐◐●
PII / secrets redaction●◐◐●
Multimodal (image · audio · PDF)◐◐◐●
Automated red-teaming●●●●
Model-file scanning (pickle/ONNX)○●●●
AI inventory / AI-BOM●●●●
Compliance mapping (OWASP/NIST/EU)◐●●●
Full prompt + tool-call traceability◐◐◐●
Self-hostable / air-gapped◐◐◐●
One API for every check◐○◐●

One API, full coverage

Lakera leads on ~3 categories, Protect AI is split across 4 products, HiddenLayer centers on adversarial-ML. ShieldBot ships the whole OWASP LLM Top 10 behind one auth and one response shape.

Traceability is the product

Every scan and proxied call becomes a queryable, verifiable trace with the full evidence trail — not buried logs.

Self-host in minutes

A single Node binary, no Python or Docker. Drop it on an air-gapped VM. Lakera self-host is enterprise-gated; HiddenLayer needs an agent.

Honest note: Lakera's prompt-injection classifier (trained on its Gandalf corpus) is still best-in-class for raw jailbreaks, and HiddenLayer's adversarial-ML detection for vision/tabular models is out of our scope. We lead on coverage breadth, traceability, and deployability.